Thank you, Ivan. I will let it pass GCC4.x.
On 9/25/06, Ivan Volosyuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It helps to maintain code with less potential problems in it. AFAIK, GCC 3.x warnings is just a subset of GCC 4.x warnings. So, if we fix warnings on GCC 4.x the code will compile without warnings on either version of GCC. -- Ivan On 9/25/06, Alexey Petrenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If this is a potential build problem do we really need to set this option? > > 2006/9/25, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi, all > > I plan to give a patch that fixed all warning in native code of luni on > > Linux and then set Werror in luni makefile. > > But now I have a problem: Different versions of gcc have different > > definitions of warnings, for example, the file can build on my default > > GCC3.0.4 of RH but fails on GCC4.0.3 of my colleague's ubuntu if I set > > warning as error on. Although I can fix it on GCC4.0.3, what about other > > versions? > > So my question is whether we have our default or reference version of > > GCC?:) -- Ivan Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
