2006/9/26, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 2:29 AM, Alexey Varlamov wrote: > [snip] >> >> > H-1519 may be >> > needed ( I suspect it is ), but we can look at it after the first >> > two fixes >> > have gone in? >> >> Look away > > The H-1519 spotted major issue, committed patch to APR thread_cond* > certainly has holes. I believe we have to fix it anyway. And the last > fix suggested by Artem Aliev looks far more mature. > What do you mean? Which fix?
Just to be clear: I suggest we apply new_queued_cond_var.patch attached to HARMONY-1519 - provided that Artem will answer comments.
> -- > Alexey > > [snip] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
