Alexey Varlamov wrote: > 2006/10/4, Salikh Zakirov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Tim Ellison wrote: >> > +1 for creating a jdktools directory. The dependency on the classlib >> > launcher should be relatively light if we go with a simple tools >> > launcher that rewrites the tool invocation into a generic launcher >> > invocation. You may recall the idea was discussed a while ago. >> >> Could anyone shed the light why launcher is considered part of classlib? >> >> As far as I understand, it depends on standard JNI Invocation API, >> and some Harmony-wide conventions about property names and files. >> I would suggest that we move launcher from classlib/ to jdktools/ as >> well. > > +1 to move launcher out of classlib. I was going to suggest this too.
Agreed -- just in there for historical reasons, it should be pulled out. Regards, Tim >> Sorry if I am missing something. >> >> P.S. +1 for original idea to create jdktools/ > > > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
