Apologies for drifting off-topic... Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> Chris Gray wrote: >> >> Chris, >> >> I personally think it would be *very* nice to have Wonka and friends >> donated to the Harmony Project, if only as a starting point for a very >> portable and embeddable JVM. >> >> While Harmony is principally aimed at Java Standard Edition, it is not a >> secret that many of us would like to continue on with Java Mobile >> Edition once the standard edition is certified. > > Don't forget that you can have an embeddable SE - it doesn't have to be ME.
Is there a spec for the shape and behavior of headless SE and embeddable SE etc.? I have only seen passing references to what they are and how they act like SE. Regards, Tim > I fully expect that over time, this project will have multiple virtual > machines, as well as multiple builds for classlib to support various > deployment platforms. and potentially configurations, though to tackle ME would require the ability to subset the behavior of the existing types as well. Regards, Tim >> I think Wonka could be a great seed in that respect. >> > > +1 > > geir > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
