Makes sense, using a standard barrier invocation fastpath. But I assume that the MMTk WB helper that it will call needs to be inlined too.
Thanks On 10/10/06, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Weldon, > I thought about slightly different approach. > Why not to write fast-path VM helper like was proposed in the thread > "[drlvm]Extending..." > This helper (a static method) can be inlined by JIT without any > devirtualization and call any method needed from MMTk or native > implementation. So JIT won't know if it works with MMTk or with a native > GC: > all you need is just to replace the Java version of the helper. > ? >
