On 10/9/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/9/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is the status of our discussions about new test suite layout? > Long ago we decided not to move existing tests until we finish with > that discussion but the discussion seems to be either dead or in coma It's not dead ;-) We are waiting for the completion of j.u.concurrent so that we could run a pilot and continue our discussion.
Looking forward to ... btw, Harmony may also benifit from "failure and rerun" feature of TestNG. I believe developers will like it!
> Does it make sense to continue putting the tests in order (according to the old > model) and relayout them as soon as we finish the discussion? Yes, it does make sense. Before we draw any new conclusion about TestNG, I suggest we follow our existing testing conventions/guidelines. > > Thanks, > Mikhail > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Richard Liang China Development Lab, IBM --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Best regards, Andrew Zhang
