Once EM runs interpreter it can set up this option by itself. ?
On 10/13/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree. I meant the interpreter mode to be tagged with "none".
What do others think?
Regards,
2006/10/13, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "none" is OK. But if you want a real JIT info the EM config file is the
only
> valid place to put it.
>
> On 10/13/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Mikhail,
> >
> > Yes, but I think we should have it by default. Another problem is that
> > we should return something even if we are in the interpreter mode.
> > Since this property is *mandatory* for all configs. I suggest using
> > something like "none" or etc.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > 2006/10/13, Mikhail Fursov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > The most simple fix: put it into all EM configuration files if you
want
> > it
> > > to depend on JIT configuration is used.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/13/06, Alexei Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I found that we have some problems with system properties in
DRLVM. In
> > > > the javadoc for java.lang.System class the particular list of
> > > > mandatory properties that should be returned by the
getProperties()
> > > > method is described. However, DRLVM does not provide the value for
the
> > > > mandatory "java.compiler" property. This leads to some problems
> > > > including the test failure from the java.lang.management test
suite
> > > > (HY-1407). This problem was mentioned by Andrey Yakushev
[1]. Below
> > > > is the small test that checks all mandatory properties:
> > > >
> > > > <--
> > > > import java.util.*;
> > > >
> > > > public class TestVMProps {
> > > >
> > > > static String[] mandatoryProps = new String[] {
> > > > "java.version",
> > > > "java.vendor",
> > > > "java.vendor.url",
> > > > "java.home",
> > > > "java.vm.specification.version",
> > > > "java.vm.specification.vendor",
> > > > "java.vm.specification.name",
> > > > "java.vm.version",
> > > > "java.vm.vendor",
> > > > "java.vm.name",
> > > > "java.specification.version",
> > > > "java.specification.vendor",
> > > > "java.specification.name",
> > > > "java.class.version",
> > > > "java.class.path",
> > > > "java.library.path",
> > > > "java.io.tmpdir",
> > > > "java.compiler",
> > > > "java.ext.dirs",
> > > > "os.name",
> > > > "os.arch",
> > > > "os.version",
> > > > "file.separator",
> > > > "path.separator",
> > > > "line.separator",
> > > > "user.name",
> > > > "user.home",
> > > > "user.dir"
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > public static void main(String argv[]) {
> > > > Vector<String> missed = new Vector<String>();
> > > > Properties props = System.getProperties();
> > > >
> > > > for (String mandProp: mandatoryProps) {
> > > > boolean found = false;
> > > > Enumeration<String> propEnum = (Enumeration<String>)
> > > > props.propertyNames();
> > > >
> > > > while (propEnum.hasMoreElements()) {
> > > > String prop = propEnum.nextElement();
> > > >
> > > > if (mandProp.equals(prop)) {
> > > > found = true;
> > > > break;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (!found) {
> > > > missed.add(mandProp);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > System.out.println("Number of missed props: " +
missed.size
> > ());
> > > > System.out.println("Missed props: " + missed);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > <--
> > > >
> > > > If invoked on DRLVM:
> > > >
> >
C:\mydoc\projects\tests>C:\Java\harmony-hdk-r450941\jdk\jre\bin\java.exe
> > > > TestVMProps
> > > > Number of missed props: 1
> > > > Missed props: [java.compiler]
> > > >
> > > > On IBM VME:
> > > > C:\mydoc\projects\tests>C:\Java\harmony-bin\bin\java.exe
TestVMProps
> > > > Number of missed props: 0
> > > > Missed props: []
> > > >
> > > > On RI:
> > > > C:\mydoc\projects\tests>C:\Java\jdk1.5.0\bin\java.exe TestVMProps
> > > > Number of missed props: 1
> > > > Missed props: [java.compiler]
> > > >
> > > > You may notice that RI also does not provide the value for
> > > > "java.compiler". BTW, we have a test in the DRLVM test suite that
> > > > should check all mandatory properties –
> > > > java.lang.SystemExtensionTest.test_getProperty_Str(). But it seems
the
> > > > author of the test makes a muddle of logical operators – puts OR
> > > > instead of AND. So the test now checks if at least one of
mandatory
> > > > property is set.
> > > >
> > > > IMHO we should return something for the "java.compiler" property
name.
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> >
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200610.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> > > > (problem 2)
--
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division, Russia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mikhail Fursov
