That works for me. then the same "token" could also be prefixed to
email subject lines, like you suggest.
Note that people should also select more than one category when filing a
platform specific bug/issue/feature/whatever.... such has "DRLVM" and
"IPF" or "Classlibrary" and "Sparc" :)
geir
Pavel Pervov wrote:
Altrenative idea would be to use just architecture name as the first
classification tag for architecture specific issues (including porting to
that arcitecture).
Examples can be: [ipf], [ia32], [em64t], etc.
Example of JIRA could be: "[ipf][classlib][awt] natives build is broken"
Regards,
Pavel.
On 10/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was thinking about the recent IPF thread, and was going to add a
"DRLVM-IPF" category so we can track things easier.
But this is dumb - there are other things for porting, like stuff in
classlib and the launcher tools (maybe).
Anyway, how does "Port-<platform>" sound as a pattern? so in this case,
"Port - IPF"
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
