Gier,

AFAIS work goes continually to test various combinations of environment
and tools, and because combinations that are stable today might get
broken tomorrow, we can keep this info on Wiki for easier editing. 
IMHO we can create a Wiki page, let's say "SureToRunConfigurations" and
add a link from Quick Help to this page. To begin with, we can use the
info from the harmony discussion to create the page. What do you think
about it?

Cheers,
Sveta Konovalova

-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 8:11 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [general] version of gcc and other tools

I'm so sick of this gcc problem.

Lets decide on the versions for GCC and other tools that "will work".  I

feel the same way that mark does re that being able to build on multiple

versions gives a better feeling of goodness and harmony in the universe 
and I encourage people to work on other versions (I will), but it's 
gotta be the case that we have a "reference toolchain" - that no matter 
what, it will work on there, and probably a list of tested versions

So, what tools and what versions are people working with ?   here's a 
partial list of mine :

1) WinXP : Visual Studio .NET 2003

2) Linux x86 :
     GCC : 3.4.6
     g++ : 3.4.6
     make : 3.81b4

What are you using?  what other tools should we list?

I recently setup a new machine (linux) and now have the complete list of

stuff that has to be installed (starting from fresh ubuntu6) and will 
post that on the getting started document on teh website.


geir

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to