Leo Li wrote: > But I do not think it is a bug: It is not prohibited that printStackTrace > can use print instead of println. > > I think it is log4j that inappropriately assumes that println is used in > printStackTrace. :)
You are right, but since we don't really care whether we use print or println I see no harm in making the trivial fix in harmony code to behave the same way as the RI. There are bigger battles to fight than this with applications assuming an implementation :-) Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
