However, if not, and some IPMC memebers still really want to see a demonstration of a release process, we can certainly do that. I've thought about what we might release. One thing that came to mind is a Pack200 jar :)
:-) So, you're saying I've got less than a month to finish it ... I'll probably be able to get *something* ready for a release, but I doubt it will be fully compliant by then. The problem is that decompressed Jars are supposed to be exactly the same for any decompressor, so that MD5 signatures remain valid afterwards. What I can probably get is an unpacked Jar that will execute, but might be in a different ordering or have different MD5 signatures for components. The problem is that there's a lot of possible combinations of input files ... I've also tended to do fairly large code drops in patches, because it normally means a few days between submission and when it can be applied (thanks for the last one Paulex :-) I'd prefer to submit smaller patches as and when new functionality is added, but it would take longer that way. PS When's the code going to be moved to a jdktools subproject? Alex. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
