On 10/20/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Evgueni,
Please also test on Linux.  This looks like a reasonable patch to me.
Unfortunately, I don't have access to Linux today (work from home).

Regarding the 16-bit CAS.  A long time ago, there was a 16-bit, byte-aligned
field for thread ID.  monenter() would do a 16-bit CAS.  Maybe this is left
over from old monenter()??

There is still 16-bit field for Thread ID which keeps ID of the thread
holding object lock. port_atomic_cas16 is used to operate with it...As
Artem said susped_request field used to be 16-bit value some time ago.
I think that's the main reason why 16-bit CAS was used. Seems like
somebody changed 16-bit value to 32-bit but failed to fix atomic
dec/inc operations.

Evgueni



On 10/19/06, Artem Aliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Eugeny,
>
> > The problem can be easily fixed by changing int16 to unit16 in
> > atomic16_dec. Do you think this is accaptable way to fix the problem.
>
>
> > BTW, could somebody explain why 16-bit atomic operation is used for
> > 32-bit value?
> The suspend_request could be 16bit value some time ago.
> Could you please file a JIRA issue with a patch.
> It looks reasonable to replace  inc16 by inc32 as a fix.
>
>
> Thanks
> Artem
>
>
>
>
> On 10/19/06, Evgueni Brevnov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Today, I had several hangs of cunit tests. It turned out to be
> > infinite cycling in
> > while loop of atomic16_inc/atomic16_dec (see
> > vm/thread/src/thread_native_suspend.c)
> >
> > Here is a snip of assembler code produced by msvc for atomic16_dec:
> >
> > call        port_atomic_cas16 (10004A90h)
> > add         esp,0Ch
> > movzx       edx,ax <-----------------------------zero extention
> > movsx       eax,word ptr [old_value] <----sign extention
> > cmp         edx,eax
> > je          atomic16_inc+45h (10004A15h)
> >
> > The problem can be easily fixed by changing int16 to unit16 in
> > atomic16_dec. Do you think this is accaptable way to fix the problem.
> >
> > BTW, could somebody explain why 16-bit atomic operation is used for
> > 32-bit value?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Evgueni
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


--
Weldon Washburn
Intel Middleware Products Division



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to