On 10/24/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 12:32 Mikhail Fursov wrote: > Pavel, thanks > SUN passes both tests (with -Xcomp too), BEA(1.5) crashes as expected.Our I wonder why it is expected :)
I tried very similar test some time ago. So it's OK that the results are the same with this test too.
VM throws ClassCircularityError with both compilers and passes with > interpreter. > IMO we must add lazy resolution to both compilers in future. The reason: to > be able to run everything SUN runs. > The question is when? > My answer: H1 2007. It is cool that we finally have tests which show the problems with out design and we seem to agree that lazy resolution is the only right way to resolve methods.
Wait a while :) Lazy resolution support is really tough requirement from JIT. May be we can find another solutions soon? I hope we all understand the same under "lazy resolution" but it would be
better if you explained a bit how it is going to work.
Let's ask Alex Astapchuk to describe it. He tried to do it in JET, so he knows more nuances about implementation problems. -- Mikhail Fursov
