+1 for separation Thanks, Mikhail
2006/10/25, Ilya Neverov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi All, I support the idea to have separate JIRA-s for different components. For tracking such changes spreaded over codebase the JIRA's "subtask" feature is very usefull - pls see [1,2] Thanks -Ilya [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1468 [2] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1758 On 10/24/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a quick note - I have done two DRLVM JIRAs today that also included > patches for the classlib tests. > > I accepted the DRLVM part, and rejected the classlib stuff as I think > that it would be cleaner and safer if those proposed changes to the > classlib were entered as separate JIRAs and discussed with the classlib > experts. > > I know that as JIRAs evolve,more things get attached, and it's really > cool that we're working together on all parts of the project - as we > should - but it can make it very confusion, so I wanted to just note > this directly. Comments? > > geir > -- Thank you. Ilya Neverov, Intel Middleware Products Division
