Martin Cordova wrote: > Oleg, I just read it, does this mean that all methods that don't need > to throw the special Headless exception, are ready to work in headless > mode?
Right, that is my question too. I've seen the general description at the URL Oleg sent, it's hardly a spec tho'. Presumably it is easier for us to find all the methods that are declared to throw a HeadlessException, and put in the isHeadless() test right now, so we can have a compliant headless implementation before the GUI is completed? > If so, we are just a step away for supporting headless? well we still have to get all the imageIO, print, font and other code working that is required in headless mode. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
