Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > Tim Ellison wrote: >> Right, but you (Mr Harmony developer) don't modify the 'processed code', >> you work in the 'code w/ preprocessor statements', so you probably want >> the code you are modifying to be real, compilable Java code too. > > Agreed, but I was thinking though about "Mrs Java developer"
Yep, she works with the post-processed source. Then we have the 'Men are from Mars, ...' conversation about "the bug on line 42" ;-) >> However, assuming you want the code you modify to be basically Java, you >> might as well make it real Java. It then makes sense for it to be valid >> as Big Java (SE), and existing editors can be used on it without the >> preprocessor as a poor-man's Harmony IDE. > > Agreed this is ideal. So what are the options? We spoke of them already: annotations, structured comments, look-aside tables, etc. Pick your poison. Regards, Tim -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])