+1 for dumping GCv4 --- I got carried away and forgot to vote!
On 11/1/06, Weldon Washburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/1/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there any reason to keep this around in the main branch? Actually, this brings up something I have been meaning to do for a few days -- ask for volunteer(s) to help with the MMTk port. It turns out that the current MMTk port depends on the underlying GC to create a 450MB array. This big array is used as MMTk's "user-level" java heap. The solution of course is to dump GCV4 and also complete the MMTk port. It seems I am spending most of my time committing drlvm patches, discussing VM architecture issues and dealing with stability issues. It does not look like I will get around to working on MMTk port for a while :( However, I can certainly show volunteers how to pick up the MMTk port and run with it :) Basically what needs to be done is in the email of Oct 23 titled, "[DRLVM][MMTk] current status and plan". I will run a seperate email asking for volunteers to work on MMTk port. -- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
-- Weldon Washburn Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
