Ya, I think we can. I would like the new features in JUnit4, but it is written in a quite different style from current harmony test codes. Migrate them? Besides, it is related with the thread of JUnit best practice discussing now. We need to make a decision since we can merge the task of migration with the action to enforce JUnit best practice.:)
On 11/4/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Assuming we get this functioning, does this mean we can use JUnit 4 testing? -Nathan On 11/3/06, Leo Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, all > I have just tested JUnit4.1 on Harmony. > With J9 VM, harmony passes both on windows xp2 and redhat enterprise > 4.0. While drlvm fails on linux, which fails to create new thread becauseof > out-of-memory-error. Since it can always be reproduced, I think actually > system doesnot lack memory at the time. So I reported it as an > application-oriented bugs as JIRA [1]. > Besides I have got the time used in these tests which shows there is > space for us to improve our performance. > > > > VM > > Windows xp2 > > Redhat Enterprise4 > > RI > > 0.985+0.921 > > 0.75+0.717 > > J9 > > 4.25+2.61 > > 2.888+2.897 > > drlvm > > 8.437+5.359 > > / > > *The former data represents the time to run junit.tests.AllTests The latter, > junit.samples.AllTests. > For detailed information, including how to run tests, I have posted it > on Harmony wiki[2]. > > > > [1]http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2060 > [2]http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/JUnit > -- > Leo Li > China Software Development Lab, IBM > >
-- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM
