On 11/8/06, Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote: > Instead of continuing to add functionality to the DRLVM-specific > Atomics class, I'd like to get a consensus on the Threads/Objects > (include CAS operations) interfaces in luni-kernel. Then we can get
Seems like last time we converged that the accessors package has to be complemented with atomic/volatile operations, but pure-JNI and VM-dependent pieces have to be kept separately (pure pieces would have to go to the luni and VM-dependent pieces would go to kernel). Each accessor also needs to be made singleton with the security check incorporated. Is my understanding correct? The proposed "Threads" interface was just fine. Nathan, will you be also proposing updates for the accessor interfaces? Thanks, Andrey.
> DRLVM to implement these classes and the donated IBM VM to do the same > so we can have concurrent support from both VMs. +1 -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
-- Andrey Chernyshev Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
