so, how did it go?
Weldon Washburn wrote:
On 11/7/06, Gregory Shimansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 03 November 2006 19:18 Weldon Washburn wrote:
> H1558 has been a big battle to get it into committable shape. I would
> really like to commit it first. (In fact, Pavel and I are working
on it
> right now!)
The patch in HARMONY-1558 is huge and often is broken by new VM commits.
Shall
we make a freeze on VM commits to allow this patch it? Maintaining so
many
code changes is probably not an easy task.
I've tried to apply it today and it doesn't apply cleanly (no surprise, 5
days
passed since the last update). I think some cooperation between VM
committers
is required to allow this patch to be finally integrated into the code.
We should either agree to let it in or let it die. I support the first
option.
Weldon, Geir, what do you think?
Pavel and I will work on 1558 in the next 12 hours. Hopefully
we will commit it very soon. It has been a very difficult patch to apply
for all the reasons you describe. It would be appreciated if you can hold
off applying any patches that might modify the same files as 1558.
--
Gregory Shimansky, Intel Middleware Products Division