On 11/10/06, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir <at> pobox.com> writes:
> Classically, licensors seem to just make a statement about it.
Yup, authors should know best what terms apply to their works. Practically
speaking, if they went with the GPL, Sun could just say "it's not 'viral' for
all the practical purposes" and that would be the quick end of any scary
problem, I guess.
IMHO, there can be still scary problems if some parts of the code are
covered by patents even if the code is licensed by GPL v2. Am I
correct?
--
Ivan
