Thanks to the many people who sent me suggestions about how to find 
permission to use a certain piece of music on my podcast. Honestly, 
I've decided that I'm spending too much time worrying about this, as 
it is not an essential element of the podcast, and I'm not pursuing 
it any further. However, for those of you who asked, I am pasting 
below the suggestions that were made. I still don't know which answer 
is the "best." -- Heidi Estrin

=============
I think you probably should have permission to use a song on a podcast.
I don't know what the law is now, but it used to be that you could 
use 30 seconds without permission.  I do know that the Kern and 
Gershwin estates maintain tight control over the music and lyrics.

I used to produce a professional "Readers Theater" program where the 
actors would read short stories and I would always write to the 
publishers for permission to use the stories.  However, these were 
one use only.  Try contacting the estates instead of the 
publishers.  What they are really interested in is that no one is 
going to make money off of these songs.

Eileen Polk, Librarian
Prentis Memorial Library
Temple Beth El
Bloomfield Hills, MI  48301
====================
There are probably two sets of rights to deal with--those for the 
song itself and those for the recording.

The current US Copyright law for works of the performing arts 
protects music and lyrics 70 years after the author's death. It used 
to be 50 years, but the Disney Corp. and the Gershwin Trust lobbied 
heavily to change it in the 1990s. So the song is certainly not in 
the public domain.

The 1944 Capitol recording as well is not in the public domain. 
HOWEVER, there are different laws RE: fair use of recordings played 
over the internet, as opposed to other broadcast media. These are 
more lenient--and probably less expensive to license--so please have 
the questioner do some research on internet fair use and act accordingly.

Another alternative might be to have a different singer and pianist 
record the song; the record company would then have no legal control 
over that recording and, perhaps, a small licensing fee could be 
payable to ASCAP for the "mechanical rights" or broadcast rights to 
the song itself.

Hope that helps,

Eliott

Eliott Kahn, D.M.A.
Music Archivist
Library of the Jewish Theological Seminary 3080 Broadway, New York, NY 10027
======================
My brother, whose specialty is Jewish music (history, recordings, 
etc.) might be a good source for your question:
[email protected]
Madeleine
Madeleine Cohen Oakley
Director of Library Services
Adas Israel Congregation
Washington, DC
=================================
I just attended the Music Library Association meeting, where a very 
informative plenary session was held on copyright. (How nice to have 
a real-world use for such recently-learned information!) 
Unfortunately the copyright issues are complicated. For one thing, 
pre-1972 recordings are subject to state law, rather than federal 
law, and have no expiration date. Many such works become "orphaned." 
(See http://www.recordingcopyright.org/ or Google "orphan works" for 
more than you wanted to know about the problem and recent attempts to 
change the laws.)

According to the experts on the panel, it's unlikely that a copyright 
holder would challenge one's use of the recording, and in the 
unlikely event that the copyright holder did sue for damages, the 
remedy would be the (modest) fee that would have been charged had the 
holder been located. But most library lawyers are conservative and 
counsel their selectors not to take the risk.

--Nancy Sack
===========================
I have been investigating your music question. All rights to songs 
written wholly or in part by the Gershwins are copyrighted and 
permission must be obtained through them their family.  You can go to 
the website at Gershwin.com or email them at [email protected]  Once 
a song has been recorded I do not think the recording has a copyright 
only the actual written music itself.  Talking to the publisher might 
be an easier way of getting your question answered because it is a 
smaller organization than the conglomerate of EMI Capitol.
Please let me know how this goes and if I can help with further since 
I live here in one of the music capitals of the country.
Enid Sperber
=======================
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Podcasting_Legal_Guide from Kathy Bloomfield
==========================
Also, it was suggested that I contact the Songwriters Guild.
============================
1944 is certainly NOT public domain.

publishers of this song are:
   IRA GERSHWIN MUSIC
     ATTN: MICHAEL STRUNKSY
     IRA AND LEONORE GERSHWIN TRUST
     101 NATOMA STREET
     SAN FRANCISCO , CA, 94105
     Tel. (415) 538-1900

   UNIVERSAL POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL
     2440 SEPULVEDA BLVD
     SUITE 100
     LOS ANGELES , CA, 90064
     Tel. (310) 235-4700
===============================
Please e-mail your info to:  [email protected]   My 
husband informed me that WarnerChappell controls 50% of the song and 
Universal controls the other 50%.  Please ask Pat who you need to 
e-mail at Unversal.  The song is not in public domain.  Mention that 
Susan Rosner gave you her e-mail and I think she will give you all 
the necessary info that you need.
  Susan Rosner





---

Messages and opinions expressed on Hasafran are those of the individual author
and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association of Jewish Libraries (AJL)
===========================================================
Submissions for Ha-Safran, send to: [email protected]
SUBscribing, SIGNOFF commands send to: Listproc @ lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Questions, problems, complaints, compliments;-) send to: galron.1 @ osu.edu
Ha-Safran Archives:
Current:
http://www.mail-archive.com/hasafran%40lists.acs.ohio-state.edu/maillist.html
History:
http://www.mail-archive.com/hasafran%40lists.acs.ohio-state.edu/history.html
AJL HomePage http://www.JewishLibraries.org

Reply via email to