One member has pointed out several issues with the film "Arranged" 
that also made me uncomfortable at the time.   I guess it is a sign 
of the overall positive nature of the film that I came to overlook 
its demerits in the long run.  However, I can comment on a couple of 
points.  The producer (author?) is an Orthodox Jewish woman and the 
story is based on her own experience.  On the DVD version, there is a 
"making of ..." segment in which they tell the story of how the film 
came to be.  The production company, a small independent, was 
approached by this woman with a story idea.  It turned out the story 
she pitched was beyond the company's resources but in talking further 
the story that became "Arranged" was told.  As far as I can tell, she 
(sorry I don't have her name handy) remained involved in making the 
film and is listed as one of the producers.

As to some specific points, I guess there is always artistic license 
but I also think the film might reflect the actual experience of one 
person and therefore is from her point of view.  The obnoxious 
assistant principal is there to give voice to those who don't 
understand and reject traditional women's roles, both the observance 
of the rules of modesty and submission to arranged marriage.  The 
character didn't need to be Jewish -- or so overt a Jewish "type" -- 
but the fact that she is does add something to the story and its 
meaning.  She comes from the same background as the Orthodox woman 
and therefore understands, to the extent she can, what is going 
on.  She readily recognizes the red string around the wrist and knows 
what it means.  She gets to represent a stream of the Jewish 
experience, one that considers itself liberated from the 
superstitious past.  The fact that her part is so heavy-handed is one 
of the failings of the film.

However, I see that the film is told primarily from the Jewish side 
and that there is a stronger focus on the Jewish experience than the 
Muslim side.  This explains the aggressive assistant principal, the 
predominance of Jewish nudnick suitors and the poor response of the 
Jewish mother to having the Muslim woman in the house.   One might 
come away with generalizations that all Jewish men are dweebs or that 
hospitality is not a value in Judaism.  At the same time, Muslims 
come of fairly lightly.  There is only one unfit suitor, the father 
and mother are very understanding and liberal in how they handle 
their daughter's objections, and they welcome a Jewish women into 
their house without hesitation.    I take some of this to be a 
reflection of the author's experience, that she felt she got more 
sympathy and support outside of her community than she did from other 
Jews, including her family.

However, with all of that said, I think these are minor points in the 
whole context of the film.  It draws positive parallels between the 
Jewish and Muslim communities and makes a compassionate case for 
traditional marriage.  I don't necessarily agree with all the points 
the film makes but I appreciate a thoughtful and positive argument 
when I see one.   If nothing else, I think it should be in synagogue 
collections and would make for a lively discussion.

-- Lee Jaffe, UC Santa Cruz


---

Messages and opinions expressed on Hasafran are those of the individual author
and are not necessarily endorsed by the Association of Jewish Libraries (AJL)
===========================================================
Submissions for Ha-Safran, send to: [email protected]
SUBscribing, SIGNOFF commands send to: Listproc @ lists.acs.ohio-state.edu
Questions, problems, complaints, compliments;-) send to: galron.1 @ osu.edu
Ha-Safran Archives:
Current:
http://www.mail-archive.com/hasafran%40lists.acs.ohio-state.edu/maillist.html
History:
http://www.mail-archive.com/hasafran%40lists.acs.ohio-state.edu/history.html
AJL HomePage http://www.JewishLibraries.org

Reply via email to