On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, John Lato wrote: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:36 PM, Henning Thielemann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Data Types: >>> HSoundFile-3 - custom AudioBuffer class. Implementations are >>> provided for UArr Double, List Double, and StorableVector Double >> >> StorableVector or StorableVector.Lazy? The latter seems appropriate here. > > I think that StorableVector is the correct choice. AudioBuffers are > meant to be read/written strictly, in small chunks. I could certainly > try StorableVector.Lazy. It may in fact be more performance.
StorableVector.Lazy uses chunks. It won't be faster but will require less memory for stream operations. _______________________________________________ haskell-art mailing list haskell-art@lurk.org http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-art