On Apr 27, 2013, at 1:21 AM, Christopher Howard <christopher.how...@frigidcode.com> wrote:
> Hi. I've got this work situation where I've got to do all my work on > /ancient/ RHEL5 systems, with funky software configurations, and no root > privileges. I wanted to install GHC in my local account, but the gnu > libc version is so old (2.5!) that I can't even get the binary packages > to install. > > I've had success installing some other simple functional languages (like > CLISP) on these same systems, so I was wondering if there was perhaps > another language very similar to Haskell (but presumably simpler) with a > super portable compiler easily built from source, which I could try. I successfully built and used OCaml 4.0.0 on a 32 bit RHEL 5 box a few months ago. https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml > I'll admit -- I haven't tried the HUGS compiler for Haskell. The quick > description didn't make it sound much more portable than GHC, but I > guess I could try it if I heard some good reasons to think it would be > more portable. > > -- > frigidcode.com > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe -- Siraaj Khandkar .o. o.o ..o o.. .o. ..o .oo o.o .oo ..o ooo .o. .oo oo. ooo _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
