Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:05:27 -0800, Simon Peyton-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > If someone cares enough to do the design work, and actively wants > the result, I'll see how hard it is to implement. IMHO it should not be done only because it's possible. If a part of Prelude is to be replaceable, there should be a chance that it's useful for something. You can't replace the whole Prelude anyway, e.g. (->) and Integer don't look as if it was possible for them. -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/ \__/ ^^ SYGNATURA ZASTÊPCZA QRCZAK _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Dylan Thurston
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans William Lee Irwin III
- RE: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Ketil Malde
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Fergus Henderson
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Fergus Henderson
- RE: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Simon Peyton-Jones
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Primitive types and Prelude shenanigans Dylan Thurston