Simon Marlow wrote:
>
> Well, simply extending the Haskell syntax to allow
>
> \ p11 .. p1n -> e1
> ..
> pm1 .. pmn -> em
>
> (with appropriate layout) should be ok, but I haven't tried it. Guarded
> right-hand-sides could be allowed too.
Introducing layout after \ will break a lot of programs. For example,
consider the way >>= is often formatted:
f >>= \x ->
g >>= \y ->
...
I guess that's why Marcin suggested using a new keyword.
- Andreas
--
Andreas Rossberg, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't affect kids.
If Pac Man affected us as kids, we would all be running around in
darkened rooms, munching pills, and listening to repetitive music."
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
