At 2001-09-15 08:31, Mark Carroll wrote:

>AFAICS a simple way to get
>out of this is to only have one exception type that carries no information
>instead of different ones so we can't distinguish one exception from
>another, but that's obviously not great.

Isn't that what 'bottom' is?

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to