At 2002-03-12 20:18, Jyrinx wrote: >Of course, this "probable cause" is ridiculous at face value ... anyway, >my code makes as much sense to me as it can at the moment ... how should >I get it to make sense to GHC? (I couldn't find any examples on
I can see the bug. It's a very common one when using monads and the 'do' notation -- confusing 'a' with 'IO a'. When in doubt, add type signatures to everything. You'll soon narrow it down. -- Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
