Koen Claessen contributed: > Somehow I do not think that Cagdas was talking about > evaluation order at all. I think he referred to the > following: Suppose I have a function f which is defined to > have 3 arguments:
That's right. I was thinking of the following syntax. I orginally had the idea for C++, where you can't do partial application at all. f x y z=... f # 3 4 omitting the first parameter, and f * 3 4 using the default value for the first argument. In C++ you can specify default values. One needs to distinguish whether you are doing partial application or counting on the default value. Of course this doesn't apply to Haskell. However, I still wonder whether there is a technical difficulty why it is not implemented! Thanks for your comments. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
