Mark Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 17 Dec 2002, Ketil Z. Malde wrote: > (snip) >> dice :: Integer -> StdGen -> [Integer] >> dice n g = take n $ randomRs (1,6) g
> Can we still do this concisely and get the new state of the rng back out > the other end after the die has been thrown a few times? Oops; I missed that part! > Or are things like newStdGen meant to be so cheap that it's fine to > use lots of different RNGs instead of one that you thread through > everything? I've no idea - I've always used StdGen's as if they were going out of style. (You can, of course, `split` them and get two for the price of one) -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
