"Damien R. Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip>
> For the reason that I'm lazy and don't want to have to modify all my > functions which use afact, or call functions which use afact, and > don't see why I should have to -- they were able to call the 'fact' > function as a global, and can refer to a global 'afact' if I define it > outside of main with a fixed value. I don't see why having a global > dependent on outside input should be so much harder. Never programmed in C++ much, eh? In general, getting the ordering of initialization right in the general case is a harder problem than you might think. <snip> Jon Cast _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
