Nick Name wrote:
Got it ;) Thanks for prompt reply. What does "should always be explicit" mean? Is there a notion of "explicit context" that I should know?

What I meant was the fact that you always have to write down *all* contexts involved in a type signature. Nothing is "inherited under the hood" by contexts in datatype declarations.

Cheers,
   S.


_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to