> Think of a list [1,2,3]. Recall this is "syntactic sugar" > (abbreviation) for 1:(2:(3:[])). That looks like
FYI, I've just added my answer to your question to the Haskell Wiki, at http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/WhatIsaFold Enjoy! --KW 8-) -- Keith Wansbrough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/kw217/ University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
