W liście z pon, 10-11-2003, godz. 16:41, David Roundy pisze:
> I was wondering why System.Posix.Signals is as it is, and whether it could
> be rewritten to use exceptions, which seems like the obvious way to handle
> signals.
I don't understand. How to handle a signal using exceptions such that
the signal doesn't abort the execution up to the nearest established
handler?
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
