On 2003-11-13T13:19:28-0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | 
> | Has anyone thought about adding hereditary Harrop formulas, in other
> | words hypothetical reasoning and universal quantification, to the
> | instance contexts in the Hsakell type class system?
> 
> Yes, absolutely.  See
>       http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/Papers/derive.htm
> Section 7, and Trifanov's paper at the Haskell Workshop 2003

Thanks for the pointers!  I am now thinking about encoding SML-style
module systems into Haskell using type classes with functional
dependencies.  For this purpose, I seem to need hereditary Harrop
formulas in instance contexts.  I wonder if such encodings have been
proposed previously in the literature?  The closest I was able to find
is Kahl and Scheffczyk's paper at the 2001 Haskell Workshop.

Thanks again,
        Ken

-- 
Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
Anytime I see something screech across a room and latch onto someones
neck, and the guy screams and tries to get it off, I have to laugh,
because what is that thing.
[http://philip.greenspun.com/humor/deep-thoughts]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to