Sven Panne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [ Just one more mail and I promise to shut up on this topic... :-) ]
Surely slamming C++ is on topic? :-) > Fergus Henderson wrote: >> [...] C does suffer from many of the same problems as C. But in C++, it is >> much easier to automate techniques like reference counting, which can >> be done manually in C but are much more cumbersome and error-prone when >> done manually. > Granted, C++'s (copy) constructors, destructors and assignment operators make some > things relatively easy compared to C, but the complexity of handling exceptions > *correctly* makes things worse again: There is a famous article (I can't remember the > title or the author) where a well-known C++ grandmaster explains a stack class, > but another later article by someone else describes the numerous bugs in that class > when exceptions are taken into account. I think you're referring to this: http://www.awprofessional.com/content/images/020163371x/supplements/Exception_Handling_Article.html I'd also add that GC is more important in object oriented programming, it's more natural to pass objects around on a larger scale. At least IME. > And one final remark on Haskell and Java: In large projects in those languages you > usually get the "genuine" space leaks in those languages plus all those nice little > leaks from the ubiquitous native functions/methods. So you have to debug in at least > two languages at the same time and I haven't seen combined tool support for this yet I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Examples? -kzm -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
