On 2004-04-29T11:50:48-0400, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote: > But isn't the point of this code that you don't > need that type signature? If I knew in advance > that it was an Integer then I wouldn't need to > passs "Integer" in the list.
In the context in which the code was originally written, the point was not that you don't need that type signature. Your comment above helped me understand what you want, I think. -- Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig BBC News: Universities face week of protest http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/3508209.stm
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
