Benjamin Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It's worse: Since according to IEEE +0 is not equal to -0, atan2 is not a >> function! > > Sorry, I meant to write: Since according to IEEE +0 *is* to be regarded as > equal to -0, atan2 is not a function. (Because it gives different values for > argument combinations -0, +0.)
>From my point of view it is a function. Only == is not the finest equality possible (but the one which is more useful). -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe