Of course you can do intertationalisation with show... There is a paper on using type classes to define implicit confugurations, perhasps someone can provide the reference?
This can be used to nicely redefine show... Ill see if I cant
dig out an example.
Keean.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
