Lennart Augustsson writes: > [...] > > But using functional dependencies feels like a sledge hammer, > and it is also not Haskell 98. >
Well, I'm simply saying that your proposed extension which is not Haskell 98 can be expressed in terms of a known type class extension. I agree that something weaker than FDs would be sufficient here. Martin _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
