"S. Alexander Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Just did a search after my last post and learned that FiniteMap is
> bad.  Discoverd that Data.Map is the intended replacement.  Downloaded
> it and modified it to work with 6.2.  Blazingly fast!

Oh?  I was aware that Data.Map was supposed to be better, but not that
FiniteMap was particularly bad.  Is there any information about 
when, why and by how much Data.Map is better?

-kzm
-- 
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to