Dmitri Pissarenko writes: > I'm curious what experienced Haskellers think about using > literate Haskell in daily work.
My experience is that literate-style documentation tends to be out-of-sync or misleading as quickly as any other kind of documentation. It doesn't matter that much whether you write | This function does something. | | > the_function ... or whether you write (for Haddock): | -- |This function does something. | | the_function ... It's just a difference in syntax. I've also found that many of the projects I have seen actually written in literate-style did *not* come with a particularly good documentation. (Darcs probably is the exception; because it is documented very well.) I use literate Haskell mostly when writing articles that include code. For that, it is great. But for everyday programming, I prefer Haddock. Peter _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
