> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:01:17 -0800 > From: Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > > Michael Vanier wrote: > >>Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:39:21 -0800 > >>From: Sean Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Cc: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > >> > >>As an aside, I kept all of the exercises in revision control. So I can > >>look back at what I first wrote and my later changes. A habit I plan to > >>keep as I move on to other programming texts and languages. > > > > > > That's a nice approach. But I can't resist asking: once you've learned > > Haskell, what is there left to move on to? ;-) > > > > (-: > > I try to learn a new language every other year or so. Lisp and I have > butted heads many times. So I thought I would try Haskell -- already > love Python and the two are clearly siblings with divorced parents. > > Unfortunately since Haskell is neither C nor Perl, I will probably only > dabble in it, much like Python. Not a fact I like, but one that the > corporate world keeps making me swallow. >
Actually, haskell and python share little except some syntactic similarities. But haskell shares a lot with lisp/scheme. There are some good books on scheme e.g. SICP (http://mitpress.mit.edu/~sicp) and "How to Design Programs" (http://www.htdp.org) which would be very helpful for the beginning haskell programmer to absorb (you have to learn to walk before you can write monadic parser combinators ;-)). OTOH lisp and scheme are strict languages, like ocaml, unlike haskell, which is lazy. That makes a big difference in practice. As for C or Perl, try using haskell to generate C or Perl and don't tell your employers where the C/perl code came from ;-) Even though I'm just a haskell newbie myself, I think it's the most interesting language around, by a pretty wide margin. Mike _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
