> You need a "do" not a lambda ( or use >> ) > > when (stuff) (do putStrLn "blah" > getLine > exitWith ExitSuccess) > > or > > when (stuff) (putStrLn "blah" >> getLine >> exitWith ExitSuccess)
Thanks a lot. Problem gone now. :) > No, that should work. Haskell equality is not at all like Java > equality. In java, '=' basicaly means pointer equality. I am not aware > of a way to even make that comparison in Haskell (in general). Haskell > '=' behaves a lot more like equals() in Java. > > Remove the length test and I think your condition will do what you expect. Splitted in two lines and it worked fine, but I still think it should have worked fnie as was before. Thanks a lot. Best Regards NooK _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
