On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Keean Schupke wrote: > David Roundy wrote: > > >In short, especially since the folks doing the work (not me) seem to want > >plain old octave-style matrix operations, it makes sense to actually do > >that. *Then* someone can implement an ultra-uber-tensor library on top of > >that, if they like. And I would be interested in a nice tensor > >library... it's just that matrices need to be the starting point, since > >they're where most of the interesting algorithms are (that is, the ones > >that are interesting to me, such as diagonalization, svd, matrix > >multiplication, etc). > > > This is a really good idea. I would like a Matrix library soon, not in 6 > years time. > Slice it up into managable pieces and keep it simple!
As I said, _that_ already exists: MatLab, HaskellDSP (with some simple new definitions for infix operators) ... _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
