Hi,
Martijn Schrage wrote:
Would expanding each let-less binding to a separate let "feel" more
sound to you?
That was actually my first idea, but then two declarations at the same
level will not be in the same binding group, so
do x = y
y = 1
would not compile. This would create a difference with all the other
places where bindings may appear.
But it would be in line with <- bindings in the do notation, so maybe it
wouldn't feel so wrong.
Tillmann
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
