2012/10/4 Stephen Tetley <stephen.tet...@gmail.com>:
> On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh <k...@atamo.com> wrote:
>> Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
>> basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
>> boring and ineffective.
>
> I'd suggest there is enough range in the Haskell books now available,
> that for most tastes, there's a beginners to intermediate book already
> a given learner wouldn't consider boring. Of course different learners
> will like different ones...
>
> As for an advanced book, maybe limiting the subject to one domain
> ("concurrency" / "DSLs for graphics" / pick a favourite ...) might
> make a better book than one targeting a mix of advanced topics.PBRT (http://pbrt.org/) in Haskell would be awesome :) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
