Hi, The Monad class makes us define bind (>>=) and unit (return) for our monads.
Why the Kleisli composition (>=>) or (<=<) is not made a part of Monad class instead of bind (>>=)? Is there any historical reason behind this? The bind (>>=) is not as elegant as (>=>), at least as I find it. Am I missing something? - Damodar
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
