Hi, dear package authors. If you define a useful class, please think twice before you do not export the methods, otherwise something like this will happen:
Am Samstag, den 10.11.2012, 21:39 -0800 schrieb David Fox: > It looks like there is an export copy of the whole prettyprint system > in template-haskell. I could switch over to that. Oh, and another > one in uulib. And also in ansi-wl-pprint. I think I will switch to > this last one. > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, David Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > It may belong in Text.PrettyPrint. > > On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 6:16 PM, David Fox <[email protected]> > wrote: > About as small as a package can get! Yeah, the Pretty > class is in haskell-src, but they don't export the > pretty method. I will drop them a line, but I sort of > assumed they had a reason for doing it that way > > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Joachim Breitner > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi David, > > your pretty-class package is pretty small. In > the interest of preventing > package proliferation: Have you talked to the > maintainers of pretty or > haskell-src-exts whether they’d include the > class in their code? Thanks, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer [email protected] | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: [email protected] | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
